About Me

Name: Sam Aron
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

 
Uncategorized

RECORDING RECORDS!

We're about to finish the year with 2 records: Highest annual military casualties in Iraq, and lowest monthly coalition deaths - standing at 22. US death-toll - 21 - will be the secondlowest since the start of war. The lowest US military death-toll was 20, recorded in 2/04, when the total coalition death-toll was 23.   
In fact, we can easily find a record in US causalities also. When measured by number of troops we lost per day, December - a 31-day month - will get a lower result, then the 29-day-February of 04.
The grim record, of course, is that 07 recorded the highest annual US casualties in Iraq.
For the new year, we wish that the US should have no more casualties. These figures are not statistics and mere yard-sticks. They are lives. When http://icasualties.org/oif/ changes the number, It's a another precious life cut off, another family cries for their father/husband/son, mother/wife/daughter - but it's for a noble cause, and we owe them gratitude and respect.
It will be interesting to watch which record will make the headlines in the mainstream, the immediate, or the one that is mainly due to developments months ago.
Happy New Year to the troops and all who support them!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Scary... We are PROFILING!

What happened to the US? Did we really forgot what our forefathers envisioned? Are we about - perhaps in the midst of the process - to sacrifice our ideals for the sake of so called security?

I can't express enough how angered I am, hearing on the news channels that we started the scary, ugly, nonhuman, sadistic practice of PROFILING. And the worst: no body is criticizing or even realizing how deep we sunk, in the name of security.

Here is the profiling story that you most probably missed.

http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1225032,00.html

As the US-British allies revealed the plot of using a poisonous liquids to blow up planes, they started with "collective Punishment" in the airports. They ordered all liquids out of the planes. Imagine the tons of pity liquids trashed in the garbage bins in Heathrow and JFK. Why are they penalized? Because the look alike that dangerous liquid that a few terrorists planned to use as a weapon?

According to the human rights rules, its a grave crime to profile a substance because of its practical similarity to a suspect. If we want to stop the danger, lets do random checks on all substances that are carried on planes - not differentiating between sticky stuff, wet, or pieces.

I'm cutting short my criticism, out of concern that some lefty radical will take it serious. Tomorrow we might see a group PELA - People for the Ethical Treatments of Liquids. You never know.

Although the discriminated substance is not a human being, its still underscoring the importance of profiling. In the above linked article, the writer is recognizing that it would be much easier to keep an eye on the potential perpetrators, then to try identify their weapons.

Its time to stop the nonsense, and waste crucial resources on random checks.

It would be much easier to use the visible signs that we have, to search a specific group of people. We all know that 99.9 percent of them are innocent, but it is in their interests, as in ours, to use practical searches to stop terrorists. After all, if - god forbid - their plane will blow up, it wouldn't profile, it will kill them together with the irish faces. So why shouldn't they agree for a few minutes of extra searching - the same that I want through lately in the Buffalo airport - in order to make sure that they and everybody is safe.

When the police are hunting for a sex offender, will they stop ladies? So why when the TSA is on the look out for Islamic terrorists, why are we ought to waste crucially needed personal on searching people we know that they're not the subjects of the search.

It's not collective punishment. It's looking in the right direction. Nobody is accusing anybody, and we love the honest American Muslims, but it's ridiculous to order the disposal of hard substances, when the danger is a liquid.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Joe, keep in mind Greenspan's advice


The old, retired man with the big glasses is having some tips that might also be correct and helpful in main street, in daily life, and even in politics: Be honest, and in the end you'll succeed!

While he's preparing 2 speeches, I would advice Joe Liebermann to keep this sentence in mind.

Joe is experiencing today what a few Wall St. execs went through several years ago. Their colleagues "cooked the books" to produce numbers that will earn them applause by the shareholders meeting. The honest people, who stuck to the laws, rules and truth, suffered a lot. Some where ousted in revolts, other saw their stock prices declining sharply. The chefs secured them selves hefty salaries, bonuses and pensions, while the true people didn't qualified for raises, due to their firm's poor performance.

I believe that when Greenspan stood before an audience of business grads or new college students, he had in mind this few execs who stuck to the truth, non withstanding how hard, against the stream, and unpopular it was. I don't remember the exact quote, but the substance was: don't be dragged into murky practices by others' successes. Go your way, and in the end you'll succeed!

Needless to say that a lot of the past successful chefs got burned from the fire. Yes, they enjoyed a year, two or three in prosperity, but it came to a quick end. Now, they, their company and investors are paying a heavy toll for it. Some companies had collapsed, had to reinstate earnings, pay fines, individuals are serving prison sentences, or standing trials.

The honest people suffered, but they're now vindicated. Now we realize that they didn't performed poorly, rather they presented the truth.

Now we have the same game in politics. Though there is no SEC to punish the crooks, public opinion will in the end see the real difference between honesty and opportunists, who'd do everything to win elections and ride with the stream.

Joe Liebermann is endangered because of his integrity. He's facing a possible defeat in the "appeasement" party because he stuck to his true ideals, and didn't abandoned a war that we started with good conscience.

I wish he should win today's primaries. Although I don't think that his party is deserving such a fine public servant on their ticket, I don't want him to go through the pain of loosing an election and being slapped for his honesty.

But in case he have to use the concession speech, continuing as an independent, I want Joe to remember that eventually his bravery and nobel stand will bring him recognition and praise.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Disproportionate Condemnation!

 

Disproportionate Condemnation!

“Disproportionate force” is the new fancy term, invented by the European Union, France, UN, and you name it diplomats. This slogan, according to them, justifies why they expect and demand from Israel to endure assaults from an uncontrolled, quasi-regime, terror cell that no other government in the world would ignore.

This kind of almost unanimous condemnation – In world bodies and diplomatic circles where its almost impossible and it takes an enormous amount of efforts and deliberations – to draft a phony resolution referring to the world maniacs, like the Iranian President Ahmnendeniad and the North Korean Kim Jong Il. The later is operating concentration camps and is a known sadistic brutalizer of his own nation. Both of them are incalculable, and it’s a great danger to allow them pose a threat to the whole world, besides the innocent people that are dying under there bloody hands.

In Darfur, Sudan, Government backed rebels have slaughtered hundred thousands of innocent civilians, and they expelled millions from their muddy tents. But we’re still waiting for meaningful steps from Kofi Annan and Jack Chirac to stop these atrocities against innocent men, women and children.

Where are the so conscious and merciful nations?

Why can they sleep when the blood of thousands are spilled in one Muslim nation, But are so appalled and shocked when some four hundred died through tragic mistakes, in the mid of an intense fight against a horrible enemy of the human kind?

How many emergency sessions had the UN convened for Darfur?

Is the current diplomatic buzzing and condemnation proportional to the efforts that Annan had undertaken to bring an end to the Darfur crisis?

Why is the blood of several hundred Lebanese victims – who’s death we, surely, all regret, non less then the 19 Israelis who died from the Katusha rockets - drawing so much attention and condemnation from allover?

The only explanation is that the political interests – of weakening the US and its allies, and the pattern of appeasing to terror – is fueling this Disproportionate Condemnation!

So, Kofi Annan, Jack Chirac, and your alike, stop using the tragic events as human shields in front of your politically motivated rhetoric.

Its not innocent lives, Its pure politics!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (5) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »